Free Speech and Hypocrisy on Lloydletta
Can you spot the hypocrisy?
Here's a hint: the original post was a rant by K*n Av^d*r slamming some politicians for restricting free speech "on the internet (sic) and on television"
But, as the snapshot shows, if I go into the comments section of that very same post, I get this message in bold lettering:
Banned by webmaster. Your comments will not be added
Even more hilarious, Eva herself chimes in with this comment:
"Samuels and Rybak are first amendment challenged"
Eva calling someone else first amendment challenged! How deliciously ironic!
You see, Av^d*r has banned me from adding comments on Lloydletta, and Eva has apparently upheld the ban. The reasons they cite are vague, but I bet it has something to do with the fact that I was posting stuff they would rather you didn't know. (More on this in a later post.)
If I were able to post a comment on this Lloydletta forum, I might point that, in fact, the Lloydletta comments section is part of the same Internet that you seem to be defending! Why do you not hold yourselves to the same standards as "Samuels and Rybak"? How can you justify banning (and deleting) comments which you don't agree with? Is this your idea of free speech?
Talk about "first amendment challenged"...